This is so true. (Sorry if the full image is not shown, but the idea is that we used to hold students responsible for their grades, but know we blame everyone, but the student.) With the way
schools are currently set up we are teaching the kids how to take standardized
test so the school can keep getting federal money and so the student do well on
entrance exams. They don't actually teach them a curriculum especially math and
science. Our kids are not learning actual information or critical thinking. We are now being out done by countries that
our own student don't even know exist because we don't teach things like
geography because schools are too concerned with keeping their funding. The
kids don't actually learn information and critical thinking skills that will
make them better, more productive workers.
The test used to asses a schools
performance have no consequences for the individual students taking them. They
have no personal incentive to perform well. It doesn't matter to the student if
they do poorly on these exams. The person directly affected is the teacher. The
idea is that if student do well on their standardized test then that teacher is
doing a good job. If a student has nothing to lose personally why would they
care what happens to the teacher. We are placing blame for poor student
performance on the teacher alone. Both student and teacher need a way to
measure a teacher's performance that does not hinge on the results of a test
that students don't care about. Then the schools cut every course and teacher
they can. Kids end up in huge classes and have no exposure to the arts or
physical education. Studies have repeatedly shown that kids that study music do
better in school in all areas of study than their counter parts. We also have
kids that are completely out of shape and increasingly obese. They are not
taught how to live healthy lifestyles. The average kid spends up to 8 hours in
front of a TV or computer screen. Student that maintain a healthy lifestyle
also do better in school. A student that hasn't learned any knowledge or how to
express their thoughts properly they will have a horrible time in college. Then
they graduate and enter the job market without any independent thinking skills
and are buried with debt. Then the cultural shift of parents that teach kids
that others are responsible for their bad grades rather than teaching them that
they have to work and think on their own in order to do well in life. We have
parents that constantly tell their kids that they are perfect and are not
responsible for their own education.
I already know there are people that will say
that I just want to see more federal money to go to schools. Not necessarily.
What we need is to stop spending money and time on standardized test to measure
the performance of public schools and divert that money to things that have
demonstrated to result in better, well rounded students that have knowledge
about a wide range of ideas and the skills to express them. They need to learn
how to solve problems with a variety of knowledge in their mental toolbox. Employers
value workers that are creative and can use seemingly unrelated knowledge to
develop ideas and strategies and solve difficult problems for their employers.
They also need to understand how to take responsibility for their ideas and
work performance. This is one area where I agree with the conservative ideals
of going back to the way things were. We used to be the leaders of the world in
all areas of study. Now we are being dominated by tiny countries. Perhaps we could follow students’ academic
performance in college by reviewing the transcript of those that completed a
college degree, and then also look at the academic performance in post graduate
areas of study. I don’t think what the student ends up doing for a living and
how much money they make. This would not work because large numbers of people
end up working in fields that are seemingly unrelated to their careers. Many
people are valued employees because they have a different academic background
than their fellow employees because they bring new and creative solutions to
problems. Also, things can happen in a person’s life that forces them to
explore careers that they had never even considered in college.
I speak from personal experience. I have a
degree in psychology. It was about half way through college that I realized
that a career of being stuck in some basement lab at a university doing studies
and constantly being under pressure to publish as much as possible because the
university expects to have their institutions thought of as a place where lots
of studies get done. The truth is this leads to poorly executed studies that
have gross flaws because they are rushed and put the scientist in a position
where they must choose between doing the job right and yielding solid data and
analysis or pleasing the university by having their institutions published as
much as they can. Being a professor became an undesirable option. My other
option was to become a therapist. I did consider this a great deal because my
friends have always say that they enjoyed talking to me because I am a good listener
and gave them ideas that they felt were good. I have always wanted to do
something that helped others. The problem was financial and an issue of the
amount of time and competition it would take to become a clinical psychologist.
All therapists face the same obstacles, but I had my first attack of what would
become chronic pancreatitis when I was a junior in school. Because this illness
affects me on a daily basis with chronic, intense abdominal pain and nausea, I
had to make changes in my diet and am required to take large amounts of medications,
some of which have side-effects that sedate the patient and cause the patient
difficulties in memory, speech, and appearance. The effects of the disease cause unpredictable
attacks of pancreatitis which result in several days to over a week of hospitalization
plus bed rest at home. Because of the
physical demand that I know faced I knew that I would not be able to devote the
amount of time and performance that a competitive doctoral program would demand.
It turns out that the disease resulted in becoming disabled.
If I had attempted a Ph. D. program I could
have done very poorly or I would have to abandon the effort all together in
order to treat my disability that consumes large, unpredictable absences from
my obligations due to hospitalization, home rest, and numerous doctor visits.
My doctors and I knew that this disease would continue to progress and never be
cured. After college I took a job as a snowboard instructor as a way to make
money while doing something I love before my health deteriorated further,
rendering me unable to perform physical labor. Because my absences became more
frequent and unpredictable my employer did not know what else to do other than drastically
cutting my hours. It finally ended when I asked off for about a week because I
had to have a procedure performed that would require days of recovery and I had
to return to KY to attend my grandmother’s funeral. When I brought up the topic
of when I could return to work my boss said for me to take leave for and
undetermined time and to not return until I “Got better”. Because this disease is
irreversible that meant that I would not be able to return at all. Since then I
was forced out of work and lost my private health insurance. So, out of pure necessity
I had to go on Social Security Disability. This left me out of work and the
work I could get had to be able to accommodate my health care issues and to
keep my income below $1000 a month or else I would become ineligible for SSI.
If I did get a job that paid higher I would have to try to get private insurance
which is next to impossible because I would have a “pre-existing condition” and
unless I became a millionaire over night I would not be able to afford what insurance
might be possible or to pay the huge amount of money my disability cost.
By this point you are wondering
what this has to do with education. Well because I grew up in a time when
students were taught actual facts and information. I know how to solve problems
creatively because between music education and an understanding that it is up
to me to figure things out for myself I developed the skills to adapt my
knowledge and creativity into useful approaches to careers that are not in the
field of psychology. I discovered that the knowledge I gained through my
education made me a better employee at every job I have had, because I have a
broad foundation of knowledge and skills to draw from. No test will demonstrate
that. Especially since the tests did not affect my pursuit od higher education.
Now that I am stricken with an illness that dramatically limits my opportunities
I have had to use my education to figure out something I can do. While working
as a snowboard instructor I had to teach student starting from the age of five
to full grown adults. Because of psychology I understand the different ways
children learn depends on where they are developmentally and intellectually. I
knew that I had to be creative in my approach to teaching such a diverse mix of
students. This was incredibly rewarding on a personal level. To have students
tell you what a difference you made for them personally demonstrated that I
have to ability to adapt my approach to a variety of problems through a solid
base of information and critical thinking. Because of this experience I believe
I would be an excellent “regular” teacher. I had consulted a vocational rehab counselor
that was unable to think of any career that was flexible enough that I could continue
to work despite my very demanding health concerns. It was me that realized that
I could use my skills I developed in my life to become a teacher. I know I will
never get rich, but I would be able to make a living and contribute to society.
As a teacher I would have the luxury of substitute teachers that could cover my
class if I am incapacitated by my disability. I would have access to health insurance.
That is as long as the provision of the Affordable Healthcare Act (Obamacare) that
prevents insurance companies from denying me coverage for my pre-existing
condition. While I explore how to make this happen I plan on applying to become
a substitute teacher myself. This way I would not have to come in to work if I
am in the hospital or severely ill. They would call the next person on the
list. I could keep my monthly income low enough to maintain my SSI coverage and
still make some money and feel as if I am providing a service to my community
rather than feeling like and being perceived as a dead beat that is draining
the system.
If I did not have the education and
sense of responsibility that my pre-education reform provided me I would be
stuck in a horrible position and no ability to change it. I have the knowledge
and creativity to solve my problems rather than blaming my misfortune on my
teachers and school. By training teachers to teach “to the test” rather than
teaching knowledge and problem solving skills we are robbing out children and
country as a whole to continue to slide down the scale of academic performance
in relation to much smaller, poorer nations. We have the resources to fix this
problem. We need to invest in proper education because it translates into
economic success for generations to come.
Conservatives want to cut spending on education because we are getting
poor results. That is all the more reason to redirect the way we spend money
for education and to increase education spending if we were spending it on a
system that got results. Perhaps if we changed the current situation of tax
breaks, loop holes, and subsidies for those that can afford to do without them
and to invest in the reform and increased quality of our educational system we
could look forward to economic growth and greater opportunity for our children
so that they can lead us to a brighter future.